Effect on intra qcular pressure and hemodynamic response with endotrachealintumation vs laryngeal mask airway insertion in children.

SUMMARY: PHD. MD proved that LMA, J. ButlerG.s. Clark, D.S. IIuges and P.J. Becon also showed in their study that LMA caused minimum rise of IOP and hemodynamic changes as compared to ETT at the time of insertion as well as removal and incidence of cough was also much less with it at the awakening...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tabadar, Sushila
Format: Unknown
Language:English
Published: c2000.
Subjects:
Online Access:Visit NHRC Library
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02848 a2200265 4500
003 OSt
005 20220906184543.0
008 190131b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
952 |0 0  |1 0  |2 NLM  |4 0  |6 THS_00038_TAB_2000_000000000000000  |7 0  |9 496  |a NHRC  |b NHRC  |c REF  |d 2012-07-11  |l 0  |o THS-00038/TAB/2000  |p THS-00038  |r 2012-07-11  |w 2012-07-11  |y TR 
999 |c 490  |d 490 
060 |a THS00038 
100 |a Tabadar, Sushila.  |9 1622 
245 |a Effect on intra qcular pressure and hemodynamic response with endotrachealintumation vs laryngeal mask airway insertion in children. 
260 |c c2000. 
300 |a 59p.  
500 |a Thesis Report. 
520 |a SUMMARY: PHD. MD proved that LMA, J. ButlerG.s. Clark, D.S. IIuges and P.J. Becon also showed in their study that LMA caused minimum rise of IOP and hemodynamic changes as compared to ETT at the time of insertion as well as removal and incidence of cough was also much less with it at the awakening caused less rise of IOP as compared to ETT in eye cause during insertion. R. IIolden, CD.G.M. Morsman period. So besides using only pharmacological means to control IOP, LMA can be useful which has already been proved by many studies. Our randomized prospective study of thirty eight patients two devided groups of either group A (LMA) or group B (ETT) for comparison of IOP and hemodynamic responses before and after the use of separate device can help to conclude the fact LMA is far better than ETT for eye cases because though there were no significant difference between age, sex, and weight distribution between 2 groups but there was a significant rise of IOP after ETT Vs LMA with P value 0.00 Vs 0.42 to 0.79 In case of hemodynamics the statistical result did not show any clear cut value Immediately after 1 minute of LMA insertion HR rise was significant i.e. P value 0.00 but not after that. In ETT group increase of HR was constant for 5 minutes with P value 0.00. From this we can draw an inference that ETT causes more HR change for long period. Similarly SBP and DBP in 2 groups showed that within 1 and 3 minutes of LMA insertion there was a significant rise of SBP with P value 0.003 and 0.008 and DBP with P value 0.002 and 0.004 but not till 5 minutes. In ETT group SBP and DBP after intubation was high all the time with P value 0.00. From this result also we can say that ETT causes significant rise of HR and BP for a long time. Complication can arise in both the groups for which we need to be careful. For the better result large sample size and more parameters for study will be beneficial.  
546 |a Eng. 
650 |a Ocular pressure.  |9 1669 
650 |a Hemodynamic response.  |9 1671 
650 |a Endotracheal intubation.  |9 1672 
650 |a Laryngeal mask.  |9 1673 
650 |a Children.  |9 1331 
856 |u http://nhrc.gov.np/contact/  |y Visit NHRC Library  
942 |2 NLM  |c TR