Comparing the Effectiveness of WHO Formula Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Produced in Kathmandu to Commercially Available Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer at the International Friendship Children's Hospital
Background: The study compared the bactericidal effectiveness of the WHO Formulation-1 hand sanitizer made by untrained hospital staff in non-sterile conditions, to that of commercially available Dettol® hand sanitizer. Methods: A convenience sample of 39 hospital staff at International Friendship C...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Technical Report |
| Language: | en_US |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://103.69.126.140:8080/handle/123456789/154 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:103.69.126.140:123456789-154 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:103.69.126.140:123456789-1542022-11-08T10:29:26Z Comparing the Effectiveness of WHO Formula Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Produced in Kathmandu to Commercially Available Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer at the International Friendship Children's Hospital Nicholas, TG Caroll, J Shrestha, A Pokhrel, A Shakya, SC Lane, N bacterial effectiveness bacterial properties Dettol® hand sanitizer hospital staff WHO protocol Background: The study compared the bactericidal effectiveness of the WHO Formulation-1 hand sanitizer made by untrained hospital staff in non-sterile conditions, to that of commercially available Dettol® hand sanitizer. Methods: A convenience sample of 39 hospital staff at International Friendship Children's Hospital (IFCH) in Kathmandu, with each hand tested separately (total n = 78). The study was run at the end of hospital shifts and subjects were instructed not to wash/sanitize their hands immediately prior to participation. Each subjects’ right hand served as a control to their left hand with respect to palm area and concentration of bacteria. The CFU reduction count was calculated as the difference between the CFU count pre-sanitization and the CFU count post-sanitization. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare median CFU reduction counts among hands sanitized with WHO-1 vs. Dettol®. Results: No differences exist in the bactericidal properties of WHO-1 versus Dettol®. The WHO Formulation-1 hand sanitizer produced at IFCH in Kathmandu using a modified protocol had comparable bactericidal properties to commercially produced Dettol®. Conclusions: The modifications to the WHO protocol examined in this study can be applied to produce inexpensive and effective hand sanitizer in other global health settings with similar material and human resource constraints. Keywords: bacterial effectiveness; bacterial properties; Dettol®; hand sanitizer; hospital staff; WHO protocol. 2016-11-09T10:16:39Z 2022-11-08T10:10:40Z 2016-11-09T10:16:39Z 2022-11-08T10:10:40Z 2014 Technical Report http://103.69.126.140:8080/handle/123456789/154 en_US application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| institution |
My University |
| collection |
DSpace |
| language |
en_US |
| topic |
bacterial effectiveness bacterial properties Dettol® hand sanitizer hospital staff WHO protocol |
| spellingShingle |
bacterial effectiveness bacterial properties Dettol® hand sanitizer hospital staff WHO protocol Nicholas, TG Caroll, J Shrestha, A Pokhrel, A Shakya, SC Lane, N Comparing the Effectiveness of WHO Formula Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Produced in Kathmandu to Commercially Available Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer at the International Friendship Children's Hospital |
| description |
Background:
The study compared the bactericidal effectiveness of the WHO Formulation-1 hand sanitizer made by untrained hospital staff in non-sterile conditions, to that of commercially available Dettol® hand sanitizer.
Methods:
A convenience sample of 39 hospital staff at International Friendship Children's Hospital (IFCH) in Kathmandu, with each hand tested separately (total n = 78). The study was run at the end of hospital shifts and subjects were instructed not to wash/sanitize their hands immediately prior to participation. Each subjects’ right hand served as a control to their left hand with respect to palm area and concentration of bacteria. The CFU reduction count was calculated as the difference between the CFU count pre-sanitization and the CFU count post-sanitization. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare median CFU reduction counts among hands sanitized with WHO-1 vs. Dettol®.
Results:
No differences exist in the bactericidal properties of WHO-1 versus Dettol®. The WHO Formulation-1 hand sanitizer produced at IFCH in Kathmandu using a modified protocol had comparable bactericidal properties to commercially produced Dettol®.
Conclusions:
The modifications to the WHO protocol examined in this study can be applied to produce inexpensive and effective hand sanitizer in other global health settings with similar material and human resource constraints.
Keywords: bacterial effectiveness; bacterial properties; Dettol®; hand sanitizer; hospital staff; WHO protocol. |
| format |
Technical Report |
| author |
Nicholas, TG Caroll, J Shrestha, A Pokhrel, A Shakya, SC Lane, N |
| author_facet |
Nicholas, TG Caroll, J Shrestha, A Pokhrel, A Shakya, SC Lane, N |
| author_sort |
Nicholas, TG |
| title |
Comparing the Effectiveness of WHO Formula Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Produced in Kathmandu to Commercially Available Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer at the International Friendship Children's Hospital |
| title_short |
Comparing the Effectiveness of WHO Formula Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Produced in Kathmandu to Commercially Available Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer at the International Friendship Children's Hospital |
| title_full |
Comparing the Effectiveness of WHO Formula Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Produced in Kathmandu to Commercially Available Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer at the International Friendship Children's Hospital |
| title_fullStr |
Comparing the Effectiveness of WHO Formula Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Produced in Kathmandu to Commercially Available Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer at the International Friendship Children's Hospital |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing the Effectiveness of WHO Formula Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Produced in Kathmandu to Commercially Available Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer at the International Friendship Children's Hospital |
| title_sort |
comparing the effectiveness of who formula alcohol-based hand sanitizer produced in kathmandu to commercially available alcohol-based hand sanitizer at the international friendship children's hospital |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
http://103.69.126.140:8080/handle/123456789/154 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicholastg comparingtheeffectivenessofwhoformulaalcoholbasedhandsanitizerproducedinkathmandutocommerciallyavailablealcoholbasedhandsanitizerattheinternationalfriendshipchildrenshospital AT carollj comparingtheeffectivenessofwhoformulaalcoholbasedhandsanitizerproducedinkathmandutocommerciallyavailablealcoholbasedhandsanitizerattheinternationalfriendshipchildrenshospital AT shresthaa comparingtheeffectivenessofwhoformulaalcoholbasedhandsanitizerproducedinkathmandutocommerciallyavailablealcoholbasedhandsanitizerattheinternationalfriendshipchildrenshospital AT pokhrela comparingtheeffectivenessofwhoformulaalcoholbasedhandsanitizerproducedinkathmandutocommerciallyavailablealcoholbasedhandsanitizerattheinternationalfriendshipchildrenshospital AT shakyasc comparingtheeffectivenessofwhoformulaalcoholbasedhandsanitizerproducedinkathmandutocommerciallyavailablealcoholbasedhandsanitizerattheinternationalfriendshipchildrenshospital AT lanen comparingtheeffectivenessofwhoformulaalcoholbasedhandsanitizerproducedinkathmandutocommerciallyavailablealcoholbasedhandsanitizerattheinternationalfriendshipchildrenshospital |
| _version_ |
1761500930091515904 |