A Comparative study of minicholecystectomy versus conventional cholecystectomy. (Record no. 2521)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02928nam a22002177a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20220906184700.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 181120b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
060 ## - NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE CALL NUMBER
Classification number THS00035
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Ghimire,Ishwar Chandra.
9 (RLIN) 971
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title A Comparative study of minicholecystectomy versus conventional cholecystectomy.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. c2000.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 54p.
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Thesis Report.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. ABSTRACT: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is being performed in developed countries as an alternative to conventional cholecystectomy for the removal of diseased gallbladder. Minicholecystectomy has become accepted procedure and gained popularity where facility for minicholecystectomy has become an accepted procedure and gained popularity where facility for laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not exist because of the high cost and inavailibity of the equipment, the need for special training to the surgeons etc. This comparative prospective randomized study evaluates the results of two different operative procedures, the conventional cholecystectomy and minicholecystectomy in symptomatic gallstone patients. 64 consecutive patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were prospectively randomized into two groups, minicholecystectomy group (32 patients) and conventional cholecystectomy group (32 patients).The length of incision was 5-7 (mean of 5.56) cm in minicholecystectomy and 10-12 (mean of 10.6) cm in conventional cholecystectomy. These two groups of patients were compared with regard to the following parameters and the results were analysed. a) Operating time: It was 60.96 (50-80) minutes for minicholecystectomy and 59.03 (45-90) minutes for conventional cholecystectomy. There was no significant difference between two procedures (p value>0.05). b) Postoperative analgesic requirement : There was no differnece between two groups for the first 24 hours. but after first post operative day. Conventional cholecystectomy patients required oral analgesic, for longer period with a mean of 4.93 days as compaired to 3.22 days in minicholecystectomy group .The difference was statistically significant ( p value<0.05). c) Oral feeding : Both groups of patients tolerated oral feeding from the first postoperative day and no difference was observed. (p value > 0.05) d) fitness for discharge : When the patients took soft diet and could visit toilet without support of others & there was no need for injectable analgesic , they were deemed fit to be discharged . Minicholesystectomy patients were fit to be discharged on an average of 2.96 days as compared to conventional cholecystectomy patients who were discharged on 3.65(2-6) days. These figures were significantly different (p value < 0.05)
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Minicholecystectomy.
9 (RLIN) 968
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Conventional.
9 (RLIN) 969
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Cholecystectomy.
9 (RLIN) 970
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="http://nhrc.gov.np/contact/">http://nhrc.gov.np/contact/</a>
Link text Visit NHRC Library
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme National Library of Medicine
Koha item type Thesis Report
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
    National Library of Medicine     Nepal Health Research Council Nepal Health Research Council 11/20/2018   THS00035/GHI/2000 11/20/2018 11/20/2018 Thesis Report

Nepal Health Research Council © 2024.

Ramshah Path, Kathmandu, Nepal, P.O.Box 7626

Web: https://nhrc.gov.np/ | Email : nhrc@nhrc.gov.np | Phone : 977-1-4254220

Maintained by Chandra Bhushan Yadav, Library & Information Officer, NHRC